Social Media Aint No Revolution

The fact is that marketing at its core is only concerned with one thing – audience. This is as true today as it was 100 years ago, and will remain true for the next 100 years. Marketing evolves, but its core remains the same. It exists to effectively communicate with an audience.

A message is nothing without people to hear it and your audience, your target market, isn’t a fundamentally different creature than it was before everyone got excited by Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or any of the myriad other sites that make up the social web.

Now, it would be naive to assume there had been no change. The tools available to connect with people are immensely useful and to ignore them would be foolish. That being said, the fact remains that in order to convince your audience to engage with your product or service, you still have to do the same three things.Social Media Isn't A Revolution

1. Grab Them

You need to get their attention. Without someone’s attention, your message doesn’t exist. It’s nothing. The fight for people’s attention is harder than ever, and to get people to notice you, you need get your message not just to wherever they are, but where they’re open to receiving your message. Nowhere are people more receptive to new ideas than in conversation. You have access to these conversations through the social web. Don’t ignore it.

2. Hold them

Getting someone’s attention for long enough to hear your message is one thing. Getting them to listen and take your message on board, that’s another. If you think that jumping on Facebook and getting a page up is enough to keep people interested, think again. Conversations are all about give and take. Provide real value through your social offerings and take the time to earn the privilege to take, or rather, to receive.

3. Convince themEvolution of Marketing by Tom Fishburne

Again, this isn’t anything new to marketing. There are probably a hundred companies out there offering the same thing that you offer. You don’t only need to be better than the rest; you need to offer people a reason to choose you over someone else. It will do you no good to shout at people telling them that your product is better than another company’s. You need to engage with them. Tell them your story. Tell them why you made a better product, not just that it’s better. Let them know your company and what it stands for. More importantly, know them. Maybe then they’ll tell your story for you.

Social media hasn’t flipped marketing on its head. It is simply a new tool to add to your existing communications strategy, albeit a very powerful one. You’d do well to keep this in mind.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Dan
    Continuing from Twitter... SM has changed the game hugely as the consumer is now king. Marketers have lost their power to influence because as consumers we have infinite access to information - so we make decisions based on numerous factors almost least of which is the marketing spin given to us by companies. Social Media has torn down the ability to 'trick consumers' in to buying. A company and their products now have to stand up to intense consumer scrutiny - if there are any lies, inconsistencies or 'nasties' consumers won't accept it and will walk, en mass. Previously a few unhappy customers could be dealt with easily, but SM gives anyone the ability to broadcast their opinion to a wide audience - meaning bad news travels a lot faster than it ever has done. SM demands companies are transparent - if they're not, they're fucked (check out the boycott Nestle campaign http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestl%C3%A9_boycott

    Additionally, social media has seen companies being unable to hide behind a corporate guard. the companies that will succeed going forward are the ones that consumers can relate to and have a personal relationship with. Take Zappos for example. Thier CEO is really active on Twitter and very entertaining and engaging - amongst many other reasons, you want to be their customer because their CEO is a good dude, and he gets it.

    That's my rant for now - there's lots more where that came from...
  • SteffenRusten
    Can't a lot of that simply be attributed to the internet? I think that the story for a while now has been the consumers rarely trust advertising until their claims have been backed up by someone else that they consider trust worthy, be that peers or some other form of media.

    I agree the word of mouth has been amplified by enormous amounts. Companies now need to be listening and monitoring social media in order to combat any threats to their brands, because like you said, the impact can be devastating. United Airlines got that first hand when a passenger made a song and video about them breaking his guitar "United Breaks Guitars" which got 3 million views... in ten days.

    There's no doubt that social media is incredibly powerful and offers untold new opportunities and threats that marketers didn't previously have to deal with to such a large extent.

    But changing the game? I believe it's the reign of the consumer is more than a recent trend. I think it's been around for a while. If someone's peers tell them that a product is rubbish, or that brand y is uncool, there's really very little advertising that can fix that. I don't think this is a symptom of social media.

    I really appreciate you taking the time to comment (rant). Nothing like a good debate/discussion to keep things flowing.
  • socialsammy
    This might sound like a cop-out but I think you're both right!

    Let me explain...

    Make no mistake we are in the middle of a "marketing renascence" where as Dan has said corporations are no longer able to trick you, dupe you or deceive you and where personal interaction and human connections are king.

    As for whether this constituents a revolution well that depends on whether or not your were an open, honest, transparent, inviting, personable and customer focused company before social media came along. If you were, then all social media has done is take your great personal service online and given you new tools to help you amplify that service and get your customers more involved in what you do. (this is what I believe @steffen_ was getting at)

    However, if you were a robotic, deceitful and dishonest company that only told the truth only when it was profitable for you to do so then the game for you has been flipped on it's head. As Dan mentioned boycotts & backlash are inevitable if you continue in your old patterns of behaviour.

    I believe one of the biggest changes is that consumers are showing companies that they really care and are willing to help the good companies become even better, the wise companies will be the ones who embrace this co-creation.

    Never before have companies been able to get their customers to actually help them create add-ons to their products (e.g. widgets & apps) or gain feedback from their consumers around the globe in real time - it is the openness, speed and dynamic nature of the customer-company interaction which I believe adds the most value to social media. (postal surveys are dead)
  • SteffenRusten
    You've more or less got me summed up quite nicely there Sam.

    I think renaissance is a good way of putting it. It's true that there are shifts in the balance of power between corporations and customers, but if anything that's been a back and forth over the last 100-150 years. I believe reputation and peer opinion has always been important, it's just exciting now to see that word of mouth is reaching such a staggering level.

    I quite like the video on this post, titled 'Platforms Change, Marketing is the Same' http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/141874

    Chris Brogan has a good take on it too. http://www.chrisbrogan.com/marketing-and-how-so...

    Cheers to both of you, debates like this really get the thought process going. Great way of moving forward. At least, it is for me.
  • socialsammy
    I agree with the "platforms change marketing doesn't" concept in theory, however I believe in reality the social web has definitely forced many marketers to re-assess how they interact with customers. Theoretical marketing preaches customer centric business practice and consumer involvement but over the years the reality is that marketers have taken short-cuts to meet budgets set by people who don't care about customers (accountants haha), again this seems to be Dans point.

    Moving on...

    If we're talking about new platforms AR (augmented reality) is going to be a HUGE platform. I'm not sure how it fits inside the business renaissance that the social web has brought to us. My guess is that it will further enhance the focus on creating a richer, meaningful and personal customer experiences. Check out this amazing post about AR by Gary P Hayes...

    http://www.personalizemedia.com/16-top-augmente...

    This is one from the HBR

    http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/sviokla/2009/1...

    Clearly there are loads of other applications also.
blog comments powered by Disqus